Should You Run Separate or Combined Meta Campaigns for Different Products?

Thảo Vũ

Launching a new line of rugby memorabilia alongside your existing Australian Football (AFL) collectibles? Deciding whether to run separate Meta campaigns for each product line or combine them into a single campaign is critical for maximizing ad performance. With similar average order values (AOV) but distinct sports and fan bases, this choice can impact your reach and ROI. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of each approach and provide actionable guidance to optimize your Meta campaigns, tailored for global and Australian markets.

Why Consider Separate vs. Combined Meta Campaigns?

When introducing new products like rugby memorabilia alongside AFL items, structuring your Meta campaigns effectively ensures you reach the right audience while optimizing costs. Key factors to consider include:

  • Target Audience: Rugby and AFL fans may have distinct interests and behaviors.
  • Ad Budget: Small or large budgets influence whether to split campaigns.
  • Ad Messaging: Each sport may require tailored visuals and copy.
  • Optimization Efficiency: Meta’s algorithm relies on data, and campaign structure affects its performance.
Why Consider Separate vs Combined Meta Campaigns

Pros and Cons of Combined Campaigns

Pros

  • Simplified Management: A single campaign saves time on setup, monitoring, and optimization.
  • Budget Efficiency: Meta dynamically allocates budget to higher-performing ads, ideal for limited budgets.
  • Shared Data: The algorithm leverages data from both product lines to find potential customers, especially if rugby and AFL fans overlap.
  • Quick Testing: Easily compare ad performance across products within one campaign.

Cons

  • Less Personalization: Generic ads may fail to resonate with specific fan bases, reducing conversions.
  • Muddled Insights: Combined data can obscure performance differences between rugby and AFL items.
  • Budget Allocation Risk: Meta may favor one product if it outperforms, limiting exposure for the other.

Pros and Cons of Separate Campaigns

Pros

  • Targeted Audiences: Precise targeting for rugby and AFL fans with sport-specific ads (e.g., rugby match highlights vs. AFL grand final moments).
  • Budget Control: Allocate budgets independently, ensuring both products get fair exposure.
  • Clear Analytics: Track performance metrics (CTR, ROAS, CPC) for each product line separately.
  • Tailored Ads: Craft sport-specific messaging, like “Own a signed All Blacks jersey” for rugby or “Collingwood premiership memorabilia” for AFL.

Cons

  • Time-Intensive: Multiple campaigns require more effort to manage and optimize.
  • Higher Budget Needs: Splitting budgets may reduce Meta’s algorithm efficiency, especially with low ad spend.
  • Fragmented Data: Less data per campaign can slow optimization if engagement is low.

When to Run Combined Campaigns?

Combined campaigns work best when:

  • Your ad budget is limited (under $1,000/month).
  • There’s significant audience overlap (e.g., general sports fans).
  • You’re testing to identify which product performs better.
  • Products share similar messaging and visuals.

Example: With a $500/month budget, a single campaign with two ad sets (one for rugby, one for AFL) lets Meta optimize spend and reach the right audience.

When to Run Separate Campaigns?

Separate campaigns are ideal when:

  • Audiences are distinctly different (minimal overlap between rugby and AFL fans).
  • You have a larger budget (over $1,000/month).
  • Products require unique ad creatives (e.g., rugby targeting NRL fans, AFL targeting Collingwood supporters).
  • You need detailed performance insights for each product line.

Example: With a $2,000/month budget, run two campaigns, each with ad sets for broad targeting and retargeting, to maximize results.

How to Structure Meta Campaigns Effectively

Combined Campaign Structure

  • Campaign: Sports Memorabilia
    • Ad Set 1: Rugby fans (NRL, Rugby Union interests).
    • Ad Set 2: AFL fans (AFL teams, players).
    • Ad Set 3: Retargeting (website visitors, ad engagers).
  • Benefits: Simplified management, flexible budgeting, faster algorithm optimization.

Separate Campaign Structure

  • Campaign 1: Rugby Memorabilia
    • Ad Set 1: Broad targeting (rugby fans, lookalike audiences).
    • Ad Set 2: Retargeting.
  • Campaign 2: AFL Memorabilia
    • Ad Set 1: Broad targeting (AFL fans, lookalike audiences).
    • Ad Set 2: Retargeting.
  • Benefits: Personalized ads, detailed analytics, budget control.

Practical Tips

  • Test Initially: Run separate campaigns for 4-6 weeks to compare performance (ROAS, CPC, CTR). If results are similar and audiences overlap, consider consolidating.
  • Use Advantage+: For combined campaigns, enable Advantage+ audience to let Meta find high-potential customers.
  • Optimize Creatives: Design sport-specific ads with relevant imagery and copy (e.g., “Collect All Blacks gear” for rugby, “Own Dangerfield’s signed guernsey” for AFL).
  • Track Data: Use Meta Ads Manager and Google Analytics to monitor campaign performance.
  • Check Community Feedback: Explore rugby and AFL fan preferences on platforms like X for insights.

Conclusion

Whether to run separate or combined Meta campaigns depends on your budget, audience overlap, and advertising goals. For distinct rugby and AFL fan bases, separate campaigns offer better personalization and insights. However, with limited budgets or high audience overlap, a combined campaign is more practical. Test, analyze, and refine to achieve optimal results.

Have you run Meta campaigns for similar products? Share your experience or questions in the comments below!

Leave a Comment